@jd It's more about the ideas it inspires in a person's head than the art itself
@cidoku Not so much fun, as doing what I can
@waifu The one I know that's pretty good is this, but it doesn't have much on it
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
@waifu Yeah one founder of Wikipedia left it due to things like this, they weren't willing to make it actually objective
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9283061/Wikipedia-founder-Larry-Sanger-slams-sites-leftist-bias-claims-neutrality-gone.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9283061/Wikipedia-founder-Larry-Sanger-slams-sites-leftist-bias-claims-neutrality-gone.html
@waifu They lock down posts so only that power mods are allowed to edit them, and they are very biased. Basically any page that has a "controversy" section has been heavily moderated or censored
@waifu Wikipedia is extremely biased towards progressives. The fact that they consider news companies as reputable sources is bad.
@waifu I would recommend against it
@LucoaMilkers For the most part it seems like that yeah!
@neets Yes, but also about a girl I knew. It's a red flag
@neets Yeah I expect I'll be still using twitter at least for my art list, which has like 3000 people I added to it
@cafeenjoyer You can view the federated timeline which shows posts from other instances as well
@elliemortem I prefer not to talk like that, but I may be dropping some red pills when I feel like it

@waifu Yeah, for the most part